Friday 15 March 2013

Personal Insolvency Update



A number of our solicitors attended a seminar update earlier this week on the Personal Insolvency Act. Considering that the Act was passed into law with the intention of relieving the huge financial constraints on many people in Ireland at the moment, it isn’t entirely clear that it is going to have the desired effect. 

There are a large number of requirements for a person to be eligible to enter into an insolvency arrangement in the first place, and considerable obstacles can be foreseen in getting a person’s creditors to agree to an arrangement. For example, if your main creditor is a bank and you are in negative equity situation, from the bank’s point of view a personal insolvency arrangement is most unappealing. At a time when the newspaper headlines are telling us that banks are going to start repossession proceedings with a vengeance as soon as new laws are passed it is unclear if people in that situation will get any relief from the pressures they are under. 

As the Act isn’t yet fully operational it remains to be seen how it will work in practical terms, and whether it will actually offer relief to those who need it. The new Insolvency Service of Ireland website is expected to go live next week and their offices are fully staffed and ready to go. Here is some of the information gleaned from the seminar: 


  •  If you want to enter into a scheme of arrangement under the Act and part or all of your debt is by way of a mortgage, you will have to prove that you have engaged in the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process (MARP) with your bank for at least 6 months.
  • If you want to enter into a scheme of arrangement you will have to engage a Personal Insolvency Practitioner (PIP). No PIP’s have yet been appointed by the Insolvency Service of Ireland, which have to approve an individual as eligible to act as a PIP. There isn’t yet any application process to become approved as a PIP. This information may be included on the website when it is launched.

  •  The Insolvency Service of Ireland expects there to be 3,000 – 4,000 applications for Debt Relief Notices (for unsecured debt under €20,000.00), and 15,000 applications for Debt Settlement Arrangements and Personal Insolvency Arrangements, this year alone.

  •  The Act allows for the appointment of “Specialist” judges of the Circuit Court to deal with all applications (except for those cases where the debt is over €2.5 million, which must be made in the High Court). At present, these specialist judge appointments can only be applied for by those who are County Registrars whose role is described here. County Registrar’s are already working full time in their respective Circuit Court Offices and are now expected to hear almost 20,000 new applications each year. It is not clear how this will work.
  •   Bankruptcy is expected to become a preferred option to personal insolvency in some cases. The new law, once it is enacted, will allow for a bankruptcy to end after 3 years, as opposed to 12 years which is currently the case. There is provision, however, for a Bankruptcy Payment Order to be put in place for a further 5 years whereby the bankrupt will be required to make additional payments from his or her income or assets for the benefit of his or her creditors. The court must have regard to the bankrupt’s reasonable living expenses in making a Bankruptcy Payment Order.
Hopefully as more information becomes available about the Insolvency Service of Ireland over the next few weeks the situation will become clearer, and hopefully the Act will have the intended effect of easing the enormous pressure too many people are facing these days. 

(See our earlier post on Personal Insolvency)


Maria O’ Donovan, Solicitor
Wolfe & Co.

Thursday 7 March 2013

Surrogacy Update- 5th March, 2013




Decision in the Case of M.R & Anor -v- An tArd Chlaraitheoir & Ors

A landmark case has been won by the genetic mother of twins born through a Surrogate. Mr Justice Henry Abbott ruled that the genetic mother is entitled to be listed as a mother on the twins’ birth certificates. The decision will be cause for celebration for many parents across the country where their genetic child was born via a surrogate.

However, for those not fortunate enough to have a genetic link to their child their rights still remain unclear. The case before the High Court was as straightforward a surrogacy arrangement as one could hope for. The commissioning parents were the genetic parents of the child. The surrogate, sister of the genetic mother, did not object or contest the assertion of motherhood by the genetic mother and actively supported the genetic mothers’ argument. Hence, the decision may be limited to a very narrow remit of surrogacy situations.

Even so, the decision has caused reverberations in the larger field of assisted reproduction. If the reasoning of the Court is taken to its penultimate, where genetics is to be the basis of paternity and maternity, Egg and Sperm Donors may find themselves unwittingly deemed a parent - with all the rights and responsibilities that attach - despite that never being the intention of the donor or the commissioning couple.

Whilst the decision is broadly welcomed in the particular case concerned, it is hoped that it will now prompt the legislature to take action and bring forth a framework which provides clarity to the array of modern day family anomalies that exist. 

Niamh O' Connor
Solicitor
Wolfe & Co.